I view Wikipedia as a resource that my students can read to
provide leads or understanding of information they are researching. Although I
know that they will use Wikipedia because it’s free, easily assessable, and appears
as the first link in their search. When
given a written assignment, I usually provide them with a limited list sources
related to the content. I have in many occasions explained to the students that
Wikipedia was similar to an encyclopedia except the information is written by
various authors. I will accept them
reading the information, but I do not count it as a major resource for their
assignment. Now I do use Youtube,
Schooltube, Teachertube , and Discovery Education in my lessons and
presentations. I allow my students to use these sources also in their assignments.
Even though Youtube is used most often by them for the type of projects they
have to complete, I enjoy watching their creativity with them. I know that
these video sources are not documentaries, but the messages can have a profound
effect on their learning.
I think the gender differences descriptions are correct that
only 16% are contributors and 9% edit. Hearing the type of tactics that are
used on Wikipedia was new information to me. I did not know that a contributor’s
work that was added could be rejected and deleted. This was astounding. In the
meantime, I could understand why this would not be an attractive profession for
activity for women. I think this is why men dominate in contributing to Wikipedia
over women.